When attorneys such as Mark Sidoti prepare for a trial, they
sometimes seek case feedback from mock jurors. The purpose of mock
jurors is to provide a response from an audience that is similar to that
which may sit as jury on the upcoming case.
Most commonly,
attorneys access mock jury services through companies that connect them
with mock jurors who are paid to review the case and to answer verdict
questions. Attorneys receive feedback from up to 50 qualified mock
jurors on average, and the comments that they receive allow them to
identify common community perspectives, case weaknesses, case strengths,
case value and potential case outcomes. Though the verdict answers from
mock jurors are not typically as conclusive or informative as those
from an in-person focus group, they can play an important role in
high-stakes trials like the ones that Mark Sidoti has been involved with
throughout his career.
Interested citizens have the option to become mock jurors through various companies that provide these services to attorneys. They must typically apply, provide personal information and then express interest in participation in upcoming online mock juries. Participants receive emails as new cases become available and they can choose whether or not they would like to participate in each jury.
Reviewing the case information can require at least an hour or two of time and, after answering verdict questions, the mock jurors are paid a small fee – typically ranging from $20 to $60 – for their services. The answers to verdict questions are then returned to attorneys like Mark Sidoti so that they can review how their cases were received and adjust their strategies as necessary.
Most commonly,
attorneys access mock jury services through companies that connect them
with mock jurors who are paid to review the case and to answer verdict
questions. Attorneys receive feedback from up to 50 qualified mock
jurors on average, and the comments that they receive allow them to
identify common community perspectives, case weaknesses, case strengths,
case value and potential case outcomes. Though the verdict answers from
mock jurors are not typically as conclusive or informative as those
from an in-person focus group, they can play an important role in
high-stakes trials like the ones that Mark Sidoti has been involved with
throughout his career.Interested citizens have the option to become mock jurors through various companies that provide these services to attorneys. They must typically apply, provide personal information and then express interest in participation in upcoming online mock juries. Participants receive emails as new cases become available and they can choose whether or not they would like to participate in each jury.
Reviewing the case information can require at least an hour or two of time and, after answering verdict questions, the mock jurors are paid a small fee – typically ranging from $20 to $60 – for their services. The answers to verdict questions are then returned to attorneys like Mark Sidoti so that they can review how their cases were received and adjust their strategies as necessary.
